Jeditorial #16


ryan-eds-pic-16web.jpg
  Last year's Editor Fiona obeyed the general steps of how to write editorials:
  1. Find a topic, current is better, that you have an opinion about
  2. Argue why your opinion is right
  3. Enjoy the sound of people not reading it

So far this year I have taken a much different approach than she did and I think it has been successful, but I'm not entirely sure. I enjoy writing them even though they are probably the hardest to write; bringing out the best of my masochistic leanings. However, it turns out these inebriated ramblings may not actually fall into the strict definition of "editorial". A few of them have points to make, but is boasting of my marriage to Natty really a "topical issue"?

I always thought the only reason for editorials were for the egotistical editor to put their picture at the front and show off their brilliance. But believe it or not, not having an editorial in a magazine is illegal, and since these ramblings fail to meet certain standards I could be hauled off to the slaughterhouse for not conforming to the guidelines as established by the New Zealand Federation of Magazine Editors. 

 

 

But I am not afraid. I'm not sorry if I do not address issues of police brutality or gay marriage or media censorship or interplanetary wars or other important topics in these lines. It's my magazine and I can do whatever the hell I want with it.*

Oh yes, I am a rebel. But I have a cause: to redefine what an editorial can be. I think it is without hyperbole that I can be considered the modern Lenin, changing the course of history, only not in Russia. No longer is the editorial page just the opinionated bollocks of someone you've never met and probably don't care about telling you what you should be caring about; it is now a place where I can let rip the darkest monsters from my cerebral cortex to infest the pages of debate with the ravings of a paranoid, egotistical, unbalanced, modest, drop-dead gorgeous young Trekkie and help you pass a few minutes of your day without being so overwhelmed with opinions that your head explodes à la Scanners.

When I came in at the start of the year, I vowed to go Extreme Makeover: Editorial Edition on this page's ass. I've tried my best but the trouble is that I have no idea whether or not I am being successful. I live in the fortress of solitude that is my office. I rarely venture into the open urban jungle and ask people their opinions of my work. I suffer from many things, one of which is an allergy to students. You guys disgust me. So the only feedback I get is the occasional angry letter.

There's a saying that if you have a good experience at a restaurant you tell your invalid grandmother who hasn't left the house in 18 years. If you have a bad experience you go on Campbell Live and let rip. Or something like that. So by that rational, every time we get a positive feedback letter, that equates to 2,000 positive letters. If we get a bad one, that equals -200 complaints, which is actually a good thing (don't question this logic, I used to work for NASA).

This year, so far anyway, we have been relatively hate-mail free, which means there has been even less praise mail. Don't get me wrong, I hate hate-mail and this is by no means a desperate plea for you to place a brick on your caps lock and virtu-yell until the larynx in your fingers are swollen and sore. Such tirades can keep me up at night which explains my extensive set of steak knives and exercise equipment that never get used. So from the lack of death threats, I am sleeping well and my boss is happy.

But this does create the problem that I have no idea how stuff is being received. So in order to gauge some perspective as to how well these Jeditorials are being absorbed into the blood stream, I have come up with a simple scale that you can rate my achievements on and send them back to me:

On a scale of 1-10, 1 being "oh my God they are awesome" and 10 being "the greatest written works of all time", how would you rate these Jeditorials? Go on, be honest.


*AuSM General Manager Sue Higgins may have a slightly different point of view than this.


Hits: 101
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy